Autism has become a common diagnosis for children with behavioural difficulties and the question arises why diagnoses of autism are increasing. One reason is that it has been underdiagnosed in the past. I hear anecdotally of adults, often parents of children with autism, being diagnosed later in life. I was interested to come across a review of a book (by Michael Fitzgerald) that hypothesizes that many intellectuals of the past may have had this impairment. The philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein is considered in particular.

Certainly having read Monk’s biography of the young Wittgenstein, he comes across as socially awkward and unaware of the niceties of social interactions. From what I understand, he sought solitude in order to escape what he felt was the oppressiveness of society. Nevertheless, throughout his early life he sought companionship, but often failed to make a connection and so suffered terribly from loneliness. His behaviour certainly seems autistic. In his later work, the Philosophical Investigations, he explores the social context of language. One of the intriguing conjectures made by Fitzgerald is that this work was driven by his personal need to intellectualize communication and sociability to compensate for his lack of instinctive understanding of them. This is apparently a common strategy for autistics as they grow older. It is also clear that through his life he was preoccupied with two themes: (1) understanding the world, (2) understanding himself. It would be natural for the two themes to become merged in his thought.
One of the interesting conclusions of this book is that autistic people make an important contribution to society.
As an aside, I was quite amused to learn that when he was asked prior to publication if some explanatory notes could be added to his rather short Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein replied that if the publishers wanted to pad out the book, they could add 12 blank pages at the end so the reader would have something to be angry at when they finished the book without being able to comprehend it!!!
November 4, 2006 at 8:44 pm |
Good evening to you, Tony! – So great to find a blog site on Wittgenstein.
My greeting to you on:
http://www.hugen.no/reisa/wittgenstein06.htm
November 6, 2006 at 12:09 pm |
Hi, It’s good to hear from a fellow Wittgenstein admirer. I like your pictures of Bergen. I also wonder what W. would have thought of dialect. Maybe he’d consider it a localized language game, or perhaps, it plays a role in communicating personal identity globally.
November 7, 2006 at 9:42 am |
Thank you, Tony! – Did I get your right when you think we may keep our local dialect for a way of communciating our personal identity – not only locally/regionally – but also globally? Did you tell the tourism operators?
I “The Duty Of Genius” I am in 1938, just after Anschluss, and W. is lecturing for a smaller group of students in a more relaxed and personal way. (page 404). “(…) it is made clear that his target was not merely, as he put it in the Blue Book, the damage that is done when the philosophers ’see the method of science before their eyes and are irresistibly tempted to ask and answer questions in the way that science does; it was more the wretched effect that the worship of science and scientific method has had upon our whole culture.”
Raining heavily here, for days, and we are told – it will continue.
November 9, 2006 at 3:22 pm |
Hi, I’m a little behind you and am currently reading about W.’s “second coming”. I like the quote you draw from W. Reading this book has been full of surprises for me – I never realized before how much W. was opposed to positivism. The quote above is as relevant today, as it was when W. said it in 1938.
November 10, 2006 at 7:33 pm |
Hello, Tony, and thank you! – What do you think of this short quote from an essay by Kjell S. Johannessen in the “Wittgenstein-group” in Bergen? This is to me a thrilling different perspective of (how to read) philosophy:
http://www.hugen.no/reisa/wittgenstein08.htm
November 21, 2006 at 12:13 pm |
It’s an interesting view. Perhaps art can express some things that cannot be said, but only shown. This would then allow us to move beyond the limits of language. I like this idea and certainly, there are some works of art I find compelling but cannot say why.
Certainly, reading Nietzsche, I get the feeling I’m learning more from his literary style than his words. Not too sure that’s so true of W. though!
On the other hand, do you think art has a language of its own? Art can be viewed as an operational language-game: an attempt to elicit a response in the perceiver. Perhaps there is also a limit to the power of art too! Eg this is one reason puritanical christians never allowed icons – for them, art does not have the power to represent god.
I enjoyed Kjell’s essay – certainly worth thinking about.
November 24, 2006 at 10:07 am |
Art is known as an object for lots of books being written, knowledge and analyses. So for sure there are languages about art. However, I like to wonder if art (also) is existing within an informal niche where the closest we can come is by intransitive understanding i.e. not to be expressed by a collective formal language.
Art for sure may be provoking and experienced as dangerous, ugly and bringing people away from God. Could be this is a sort of a commenting sub-language, and the reactions not originated in the art, but in the spectators.
And when is art art?
I have now completed the reading of The Duty of Genius, and is halfway through the much shorter “Wittgenstein” by Gunnar Fredriksson (in Norwegian). I strange thing to me: I am about to have read three biographies in one line (on same person). And it has all been a very special and nice experience. What is it about, this Wittgenstein magic?
December 5, 2006 at 9:56 am |
> When is art art?
An artist friend of mine says that anything is art so long as it is presented as such: ie framed or placed in a gallery. So art is in the intention rather than the object. I quite like this definition: very broad but also operational.
> What is it about, this Wittgenstein magic?
There are two things that attract me to W.:
(1) His uncompromising personality. As Ray Monk puts it (maybe rather dramatically), for W., there are two possibilities: genius or death.
(2) His cavalier attitude to philosophy; eg his argument against mathematical logic is that it is “bosh”! Sometimes, I think there is a need for someone to say this in philosophy. It can often get wrapped up in itself and it then needs a good shake. Or as Alan Watts once said, philosophers never know when to stop boiling an egg.
What do you find in W.’s work and life?
What do you think of Fredriksson’s biography? How does it compare with Monk’s?
December 12, 2006 at 3:20 pm |
To me Wittgenstein is both his life story and his philosophy. His life story
is so strongly connected to the story and tragedy of Europe before the 1900-
wars and between them, and after the second one. When I read about him and
his own words, water comes into my eyes and my heart throbs by joy. His
selfwilled loneliness and his desperate longing for company, and his burning
love stories, – and that face of him, that brave person, so honest and so
annoying, a losing winner. – His philosophy, during the small coins I am
able to catch, – are making me rich and open up inspiring perspectives.
I feel I can trust Fredriksson. He is talking more to an audience, trying to make them (i.e. me) understand, and I find his help useful. And of course it is a good thing to read it in Norwegian! #;-) He is not great as Monk, – however, erecting an extra ladder.
Netfriends have pointed to htt://www.philosphynow.org The running number has Wittgenstein for a top topic!
December 12, 2006 at 3:22 pm |
The correct address is: http://www.philosophynow.org
December 19, 2006 at 2:37 pm |
I couldn’t agree more. Wittgenstein’s life story and philosophy are intricately connected.
Yes, I was pleased to see a special issue on Wittgenstein in last month’s Philosophy Now. Haven’t had much time to read the articles yet, unfortunately!
Merry Christmas,
Tony
December 20, 2006 at 11:44 am |
Thanks Tony, for the nice blog contact we have shared!
A Christmas greeting on top of http://www.hugen.no
most friendly
Enok
August 17, 2008 at 9:42 am |
[...] http://agbellotti.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/wittgenstein-and-autism/ [...]
November 2, 2008 at 5:20 pm |
Thank you for your site
I made on photoshop backgrounds for myspace or youtube and whatever
my backgrounds:http://tinyurl.com/5assk2
Hope you had a good day and thank you again!